The government argues that speed cameras reduce accidents and reduce the number of drivers who break the law by speeding.
If that's true, why don't they introduce serial-killer cameras? Eh? Eh?
Because it doesn't bring in enough cash to the left-wing councils, that's why!
Cash that they spend on intrusive and ugly CCTV cameras, spoiling our lovely towns. How dare they! Why can't they spend the money on crime prevention instead?
They should spend the money on more policemen to go out and arrest hoodie-wearing ASBO kids.
But we pay their wages so they'd better not arrest us as we drive our barely-one-quarter-occupied, enormous 4x4s round residential streets at 45mph. Anyway we wouldn't have to drive our brats the 1.3 miles to school if the roads weren't so dangerous.
Only last Christmas my husband (who's something big in the City) saw a film about a central-European immigrant gypsy in a brightly painted vehicle who snatched children off the streets with the promise of sweets.
If Chitty-Chitty-Bang-Bang teaches us anything, it's that we have to drown all these asylum seekers at birth!
Oh, hello nurse. Is that my medicine?
This message was sponsored by the Daily Mail]